WABA supports HB 135, which would establish a “routine accommodation” policy for safe, separated pedestrian and bicycle facilities on bridges and across-controlled access highways.
You can view this document in PDF form here.
HB 135: Transportation - Maryland Transportation Authority - Pedestrian and
Bicycle Safety and Accessibility
House Environment and Transportation Committee
Washington Area Bicyclist Association – FAVORABLE
February 22, 2024
Chair Korman and Committee Members,
The Washington Area Bicyclist Association (WABA) is an advocacy organization with 1,200 Maryland
members, founded in 1972. We fight for a just and sustainable transportation system where walking,
biking, and transit are the best ways to get around.
WABA supports HB 135, which would establish a “routine accommodation” policy for safe, separated
pedestrian and bicycle facilities on bridges and across-controlled access highways. It would, in effect,
extend “complete streets” provisions to the Maryland Transportation Administration (MDTA), the one
Maryland transportation entity not covered by 2018 legislation that required the Maryland
Transportation Authority and MDOT modal administrations to adopt a complete streets policy that
requires the implementation of certain complete streets design features.
The MDTA exemption has led to the omission of separated bicycle and pedestrian facilities from the
Harry W. Nice Memorial Bridge, despite a previous governor's announcement that the bridge would
include them. The MDTA similarly failed to deliver continuous bikeways, as had been promised, along the
entirety of MD 200, the Intercounty Connector.
These omissions – the result of an unjustified exemption – limit Marylanders’ and visitors’ green
transportation and recreation options. The current MDTA policies endanger bicyclists and pedestrians
who seek to use or cross MDTA facilities, contrary to the state’s Vision Zero commitment. Further
omissions may additionally cost us federal transportation funding and will certainly limit mobility
options for new or reconstructed facilities such as the I-495 Potomac crossing, a new Chesapeake Bay
Bridge, and a new Susquehanna River crossing.
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, if designed into projects, add modest additional cost, which is justified
by mobility, tourism, and economic benefits. The cost of these facilities is an insufficient reason for
concern about this bill.
The Washington Area Bicyclist Association urges a Favorable HB 135 committee report and House
floor vote.
Thank you for the opportunity to testify on this legislation.
Seth Grimes, seth.grimes@waba.org